Insights, tips, and resources to help you succeed in your test preparation journey
A clear, practical guide to SHL assessments - with free **SHL-style practice tests**. Understand each format (numerical, verbal, inductive, deductive, checking, SJT, OPQ), how percentile scoring works, typical timings, and prep tactics that lift results—timing control, skip/return, and role-aligned judgement—so you stand out in competitive hiring.
Clifford Chance uses the Watson–Glaser as a primary gate to find trainees who can make calm, defensible decisions under time pressure. You’ll face the standard five skills, but with denser, commercially nuanced passages—where Inference and Evaluation often matter most. Prep by hardening decision speed, aligning your reasoning across application and interview.
This guide is a complete walkthrough of the Watson Glaser Test used by **Linklaters**, one of the UK's Magic Circle law firms. It offers insider strategies to help applicants not only pass but stand out. The guide explains how Linklaters uniquely uses the Watson Glaser to measure analytical thinking, assumption recognition, and logical judgment under time pressure.
The article explains the Watson Glaser “Recognition of Assumptions” section, which tests your ability to spot unstated beliefs that an argument quietly relies on. Each item gives a statement and a proposed assumption; your task is to decide whether the assumption is made (necessary for the reasoning to work) or not made (the argument stands without it). You’re judging necessity, not truth. It highlights common pitfalls—bringing in personal knowledge, confusing evidence with assumptions, treating what sounds reasonable as implied, and over-interpreting simple wording—and recommends a clear method: restate the argument to expose gaps and use the reverse test (if the assumption were false, would the reasoning collapse?). The page includes a free practice quiz, links to other Watson Glaser sections, and encourages regular practise with TestRocket.ai’s adaptive feedback to build speed, accuracy, and confidence.
The article outlines the Watson Glaser Inference section, where you judge how likely proposed conclusions are based solely on a short passage, using the five labels: True, Probably true, Insufficient data, Probably false, and False. It warns against common mistakes such as importing outside knowledge, confusing correlation with causation, mishandling probability, and overlooking qualifiers like “some” or “may.” To work faster and more accurately, it suggests testing extreme claims first, defaulting to “Insufficient data” when the text is neutral, visualising relationships, and separating facts from interpretations. A sample item and a free interactive quiz are provided, and TestRocket.ai offers adaptive practice to build the disciplined, evidence-based reasoning this section rewards.
The article covers the Watson Glaser Arguments section, which tests how well you judge whether an argument logically supports a given proposal based on relevance and reasoning—not on personal beliefs or real-world truth. Each item presents a statement and related arguments; your job is to label each as Strong (direct, significant, logically supportive) or Weak (irrelevant, emotional, or poorly reasoned). It warns against common traps like letting opinion creep in, mistaking persuasive tone for logic, and checking factual truth instead of logical relevance. Practical advice includes cutting obvious irrelevancies first, rephrasing arguments in plain English, and checking for a clear logical link, with examples and a free quiz to build speed and confidence.
The article explains the Watson Glaser Interpretation section, which tests whether a conclusion must follow from a given passage using only the information provided. You judge each proposed conclusion as “follows” or “does not follow,” focusing on necessity rather than probability or real-world truth. It warns against letting assumptions creep in, missing quantifiers like “some” or “all,” and falling for logical reversals (e.g., mistaking “If A then B” for “If B then A”). The page offers a free practice quiz with worked examples and promotes disciplined, timed practice with TestRocket.ai to build accuracy under pressure.
The article explains that the Deduction section measures your ability to decide whether a conclusion strictly follows from a given set of premises, assessing how you think rather than what you know. You must accept the passage as true, ignore outside information, and label each proposed conclusion as “follows” or “does not follow.” Employers value this skill for roles requiring analytical rigour (e.g., law, finance, strategy), because it rewards clear, assumption-free reasoning. It flags common pitfalls—bringing in general knowledge, adding assumptions, or misreading the claim—and points to a free quiz and structured, test-like practise with TestRocket.ai to build accuracy first and speed next.
This guide explains the Watson Glaser as a high-stakes critical-thinking test used in law, consulting, and leadership hiring, covering five sections—Inference, Recognition of Assumptions, Deduction, Interpretation, and Evaluation of Arguments—across 40 questions (typically 30–40 minutes). You’ll see both fixed-form (WG II) and item-banked (WG III) formats, delivered mainly online and published by TalentLens for employers. The article includes free practice questions and a RED-model playbook—Recognise assumptions, Evaluate arguments, Draw conclusions—plus targeted tips to build accuracy, speed, and confidence.
This 2025 guide explains the Watson Glaser as the gold-standard critical-thinking test used in law, finance, consulting and leadership hiring, assessing five skills—Inference, Recognition of Assumptions, Deduction, Interpretation and Evaluation of Arguments—across 40 timed questions (about 30 minutes). It outlines formats and versions (older fixed-form WG II vs. the widely used online, item-banked WG III), how results are reported (raw score and percentile), and why top employers rely on it to filter candidates who can think clearly under pressure. The article details why the test feels hard—tight timing, tricky wording and the requirement to use only the given information—and contrasts strict cut-offs in law with broader use in other industries. You also get preparation strategies (timed practice, elimination, review of mistakes, RED model), a test-day checklist and links to free, fully explained practice questions.
Join our growing community of successful candidates who aced their tests with TestRocket's AI-powered preparation. Start practicing today with our 30-day money-back guarantee.