Landing a Role at Linklaters: Your Complete Watson Glaser Test Guide
•
Breaking into a Magic Circle firm takes more than a polished CV.The firm uses pre-interview screening to identify candidates who demonstrate disciplined thinking and commercial judgement and remain calm under pressure. The guide provides an inside look at the application process through a practical walkthrough that reveals exclusive tactics which most candidates are unaware of: Linklaters' reasoning signal weighting system and common time-wasting areas and mental frameworks that boost Watson Glaser scores quickly.
Inside the Linklaters Hiring Journey – Step by Step
The intake process follows a standard sequence which may differ slightly between intakes but generally follows this pattern:
Online Application – behavioural questions + academic history.Your answers should read like concise case studies with outcomes, not biographies.
Watson Glaser Test (online) – the main filter.Here’s where most drop off.
The assessment includes interviews and assessment exercises which evaluate both commercial awareness and competency and case elements.
The Assessment Centre / Final Stage includes deeper casework, partner exposure, and culture fit.
Offer – training contract or programme route.
Each stage should be treated as a “signal checkpoint” according to the advanced tip. Your application demonstrates evidence; Watson Glaser demonstrates method; interviews demonstrate judgement.The three signals should remain constant throughout the entire journey.
The Watson Glaser Test: Why It Matters at Linklaters
Linklaters requires trainees who possess the ability to distinguish facts from inferences while preventing assumption traps and constructing defensible conclusions quickly. Watson Glaser is the fastest, fairest proxy for that.It measures:
Inference (what follows, what doesn’t)
Recognition of Assumptions (what must be true for an argument to hold)
Deduction (does the conclusion follow?)
Interpretation (is the conclusion warranted by the data?)
Evaluation of Arguments (strength & relevance)
Recruiter reality: The test isn’t about niche legal knowledge.It’s about whether your thinking is consistent, auditable, and time-efficient—exactly what clients pay for.
Linklaters Watson Glaser vs Standard Watson Glaser – Key Differences
A practical comparison follows with a third section showing how to modify your preparation to benefit from the differences.
Linklaters Watson Glaser vs Standard Watson Glaser – Key Differences
Aspect
Standard Watson Glaser
Linklaters Watson Glaser
How to Adapt Your Prep
Purpose
Generic critical-thinking screen across industries.
Optimised for high-stakes legal/commercial reasoning.
Practice with business-tinged texts; summarise FT/Lex columns into premise → conclusion chains.
Difficulty Feel
Moderate–challenging.
Feels tighter, with less tolerance for dithering.
Drill 2×10-minute sprints daily (not just full mocks) to harden decision speed.
Context Styling
Everyday or neutral scenarios.
The text requires a commercial and legal tone with additional complex sections.
Create a list of common traps (e.g., unless, only if, some, may) and mark them during your practice.
Timing Pressure
Standard overall window.
The same clock operates but each item requires more mental effort to process.
Use a 70/25/5 time split: first pass 70%, second pass 25%, buffer 5%.Flag and move.
Scoring Signal
Balanced across sections.
The predictive power of Inference & Evaluation tends to be stronger than other approaches.
Over-index practice on Inference/Evaluation (60% of drills) while maintaining accuracy elsewhere.
Benchmarking
Varies by employer.
Competitive percentiles; pass bands skew higher.
Track your rolling 7-day median; aim for top-quartile scores before sitting the real test.
Common Fail Points
Misreading quantifiers; rushing.
Over-reasoning; assumption blind spots.
Use the NEGATION PIVOT: “If this assumption were false, would the argument collapse?”
Question Phrasing
Cleaner, fewer distractors.
Subtly layered wording and qualifier stacking.
Do a 5-second pre-read: highlight premises, underline quantifiers, circle conclusion verb.
Impact on Process
One factor among several.
The primary gate represents the first point of failure which causes the process to terminate.
Front-load prep before applying; don’t treat it like a warm-up round.
Best Prep Mode
Broad familiarisation.
Targeted, high-fidelity simulation with review loops.
Error Log 2.0: for each miss, record trap type, trigger word, and fix; revisit every 48 hours.
Mastering the Linklaters Watson Glaser Test – What You Must Know
Go beyond “doing lots of questions”.Engineer your thinking:
Inference Ladder – Classify quickly: conclusion follows / probably follows / insufficient data / probably does not follow / does not follow.Don’t sit in the grey zone longer than 30–40 seconds.
Assumption X-Ray – Ask: What must be true?What was left unsaid?Watch for scope leaps (e.g., “some” → “all”).
Deduction Discipline – The contrapositive is not the inverse.Write mini-forms: If A→B; not B ⇒ not A (valid).
Interpretation Rule-of-Three – Demand three supporting data points (trend, boundary, exception) before accepting a broad conclusion.
Evaluation TRIBE Test – Is the argument True-aligned, Relevant, Independent of the claim, Balanced, Evidence-anchored?
Free Linklaters Watson Glaser Practice Test
Here you can take our free Linklaters-style Watson Glaser practice, split by section: Inference (2 questions), Recognition of Assumptions (2 questions), Deduction (2 questions), Interpretation (2 questions), and Evaluation of Arguments (2 questions).
Each section starts with a short, practical note and a Pro Tip focused on what matters most in a Linklaters recruitment-style critical thinking test: reading accurately under time pressure, avoiding tempting leaps, and sticking only to what the passage actually supports. Once you finish the free test, you’ll get your score, plus all correct answers with clear, step-by-step explanations so you can see exactly where your reasoning was strong - and where it slipped.
Practice Free Linklaters Watson Glaser Test Questions:
15 pages • 10 minutes
This quiz is built for candidates preparing for the Linklaters Watson Glaser assessment. The questions target the same core skills the test rewards: working strictly from the information provided, noticing what’s being taken for granted (without being said), and telling solid reasoning apart from arguments that only sound convincing.
You’ll practise across the five key areas - Inference, Recognition of Assumptions, Deduction, Interpretation, and Evaluation of Arguments. Treat each question as you would in the real assessment: rely only on what’s on the page, be precise with wording, and manage your time. After you complete the quiz, the explanations walk you through the logic behind each answer so you can sharpen your technique and improve quickly.
1
Read each question carefully before selecting your answer.
2
Navigate between questions using the Previous/Next buttons.
3
Submit your quiz to receive detailed results and explanations.
Practice Free Linklaters Watson Glaser Test Questions:
Page 1 of 15
Free Inferences Sample Questions
In this section, you’ll read a short passage that sets out a handful of facts. For the purposes of the test, accept everything in the passage as true - even if it clashes with what you know outside the text.
After that, you’ll be given several statements. Your job is to judge each one on its own and decide how strongly it’s supported by the passage - whether it clearly follows, seems likely, can’t be confirmed, or is contradicted.
Questions: 2
Time Limit: 2 minutes
💡 Pro Tip:
Be disciplined: stay inside the passage. No “real-world” knowledge, no filling in gaps.
If a detail isn’t stated or clearly implied, treat it as Insufficient Data. In the Clifford Chance-style Watson Glaser, many traps are built around statements that sound sensible but aren’t actually backed by the text. Train yourself to separate what’s written from what you’re tempted to assume.
Inferences Question 1 of 2
A city adopted a new residential parking ordinance. Weekday street parking in signed zones now requires a resident permit; guests may use host-issued visitor permits obtained through the city’s portal. Parking officers have been told to prioritize enforcement near schools and transit stops. Officials say the changes aim to improve safety and reduce congestion.
Proposed Inference:
First-time violations for not displaying a resident permit will result in a written warning rather than a fine.
Inferences Question 2 of 2
In June 2025, a neighborhood grocery introduced a weekly staples bundle priced at $28, advertised as cheaper than buying the same items separately for $34. During the promotion, loyalty members received a $2 checkout rebate per bundle. The store also kept all individual item prices unchanged for the month.
Proposed Inference:
Loyalty members effectively paid $26 per bundle during the promotion.
Free Recognition of Assumptions Sample Questions
Next up is Recognition of Assumptions. Here, you’re not judging whether a statement is true or sensible - you’re deciding whether the writer is quietly relying on an unstated belief to make their point.
For each item, you’ll be shown a short statement and a proposed assumption. Your task is to choose whether that assumption is genuinely “taken for granted” in the argument, or whether the argument can stand without it.
Questions: 2
Time Limit: 2 minutes
💡 Pro Tip:
Don’t mix up assumptions and conclusions.
An assumption is the hidden support the argument needs before the claim can work. A conclusion is what the argument is trying to prove afterwards. A reliable check is to ask: “Does this have to be true for the statement to make sense?” If the argument collapses without it, the assumption is made. If the argument still holds, it isn’t.
Recognition of Assumptions Question 1 of 2
Over the past year, energy prices rose by 22%, leading to increased costs for manufacturing firms.
Proposed Assumption:
Manufacturing firms rely on energy to operate.
Recognition of Assumptions Question 2 of 2
Rising interest rates can slow consumer spending.
Proposed Assumption:
Consumer spending increases when interest rates fall.
Free Deduction Sample Questions
In Deduction, your job is to decide whether a conclusion must follow from the information given. This is the most “black and white” part of the Watson Glaser: you’re working with strict logic, not likelihood, not what usually happens, and not what feels reasonable.
You’ll be shown a short set of statements (treat them as true), followed by a proposed conclusion. Your task is to judge whether that conclusion is logically guaranteed by the facts - or whether there’s any gap that makes it unsafe.
Questions: 2
Time Limit: 2 minutes
💡 Pro Tip:
In Deduction, “probably” doesn’t count - only certainty does.
A conclusion follows only when it’s 100% forced by the text. If there’s even one realistic way the premises could be true and the conclusion still false, the right choice is Conclusion Does Not Follow. Stay strict, and don’t reward conclusions just because they sound sensible.
Deduction Question 1 of 2
No international law firms are exempt from anti-money laundering regulations. Some international law firms have offices in over 30 countries.
Proposed Conclusion:
At least one law firm with offices in over 30 countries is exempt from anti-money laundering regulations.
Deduction Question 2 of 2
Under the revised academic funding policy, a university department may either receive government research grants or accept corporate sponsorship, but not both. All departments in the School of Pure Sciences receive government research grants. No department that accepts corporate sponsorship is allowed to participate in national ethics committees.
Proposed Conclusion:
Departments that participate in national ethics committees may be receiving government research grants.
Free Interpretation Sample Questions
In Interpretation, you’re judging whether a conclusion is supported by the passage beyond a reasonable doubt. This isn’t strict “must be true” logic like Deduction - but it’s also not a loose “sounds plausible” judgement either. You’re looking for conclusions that are strongly backed by what’s given.
You’ll read a short passage and then assess whether each proposed conclusion is a fair, well-supported reading of the information, based solely on the text.
Questions: 2
Time Limit: 2 minutes
💡 Pro Tip:
Aim for “beyond reasonable doubt” - not “could be”.
A conclusion can follow even if it isn’t mathematically certain, but it must be clearly the best fit for the evidence. If you can see a reasonable alternative explanation that still matches the passage, the safe answer is Conclusion Does Not Follow. A good check is: “Would a careful reader have to agree with this, based on the text?” If not, be cautious.
Interpretation Question 1 of 2
The summer swimming program will include 12 beginner classes and 8 advanced classes at the community pool. All classes will be taught by certified instructors.
Proposed Interpretation:
The program includes classes for swimmers who are not beginners.
Interpretation Question 2 of 2
The travel agency offers guided city tours that include transportation and a professional guide. Bookings can be made online or at the agency’s main office.
Proposed Interpretation:
Bookings made online include a complimentary travel insurance policy.
Free Inferences Sample Questions
In this section, you’ll read a short passage that sets out a handful of facts. For the purposes of the test, accept everything in the passage as true - even if it clashes with what you know outside the text.
After that, you’ll be given several statements. Your job is to judge each one on its own and decide how strongly it’s supported by the passage - whether it clearly follows, seems likely, can’t be confirmed, or is contradicted.
Questions: 2
Time Limit: 2 minutes
💡 Pro Tip:
Be disciplined: stay inside the passage. No “real-world” knowledge, no filling in gaps.
If a detail isn’t stated or clearly implied, treat it as Insufficient Data. In the Clifford Chance-style Watson Glaser, many traps are built around statements that sound sensible but aren’t actually backed by the text. Train yourself to separate what’s written from what you’re tempted to assume.
Inferences Question 1 of 2
A neighborhood community center introduced app-based class reservations, converted a lounge into a quiet study room, and opened a supervised playroom so parents can work out nearby. Staff said the aim is to reduce last-minute class cancellations and make visits easier for families.
Proposed Inference:
The supervised playroom is operated by licensed childcare professionals.
Inferences Question 1 of 2
In September 2025, a neighborhood café introduced a weekday breakfast combo at $6.50 (coffee + pastry), advertised as $2.00 cheaper than buying the items separately. Loyalty members earn 3 bonus points per combo (every 10 points = $1 credit). Individual item prices remained unchanged, and the café added a 10-combo punch card that gives the 11th combo free.
Proposed Inference:
The popularity of the breakfast combo will be determined solely by the 3 bonus points perk.
Quiz Complete!
Keep practicing to improve your score.
0%
Your Score
10
Total Pages
RETRY
Result
Review Your Answers
Question 1
A city adopted a new residential parking ordinance. Weekday street parking in signed zones now requires a resident permit; guests may use host-issued visitor permits obtained through the city’s portal. Parking officers have been told to prioritize enforcement near schools and transit stops. Officials say the changes aim to improve safety and reduce congestion.
Proposed Inference:
First-time violations for not displaying a resident permit will result in a written warning rather than a fine.
YOUR ANSWER
Not answered(INCORRECT)
CORRECT ANSWER
Insufficient Data
EXPLANATION
The statement describes who needs permits and where enforcement is prioritized, but says nothing about penalty sequencing or leniency for first offenses. Prioritization areas don’t imply warning-first policies. Without details on the ordinance’s penalty schedule, there’s no basis to say this is true or false.
Question 2
In June 2025, a neighborhood grocery introduced a weekly staples bundle priced at $28, advertised as cheaper than buying the same items separately for $34. During the promotion, loyalty members received a $2 checkout rebate per bundle. The store also kept all individual item prices unchanged for the month.
Proposed Inference:
Loyalty members effectively paid $26 per bundle during the promotion.
YOUR ANSWER
Not answered(INCORRECT)
CORRECT ANSWER
True
EXPLANATION
The bundle price is $28 and loyalty members get a $2 rebate per bundle, so $28 − $2 = $26. This is directly supported by the figures; it’s tricky” only because it requires a quick calculation.
Question 3
Over the past year, energy prices rose by 22%, leading to increased costs for manufacturing firms.
Proposed Assumption:
Manufacturing firms rely on energy to operate.
YOUR ANSWER
Not answered(INCORRECT)
CORRECT ANSWER
Assumption Made
EXPLANATION
For higher energy prices to increase their costs, those firms must use energy. Otherwise, the impact wouldn’t exist. The assumption is embedded in the logic.
Question 4
Rising interest rates can slow consumer spending.
Proposed Assumption:
Consumer spending increases when interest rates fall.
YOUR ANSWER
Not answered(INCORRECT)
CORRECT ANSWER
Assumption Not Made
EXPLANATION
The statement refers to the effect of rising rates. The reverse effect is not discussed or required, so this assumption goes beyond the text.
Question 5
No international law firms are exempt from anti-money laundering regulations. Some international law firms have offices in over 30 countries.
Proposed Conclusion:
At least one law firm with offices in over 30 countries is exempt from anti-money laundering regulations.
YOUR ANSWER
Not answered(INCORRECT)
CORRECT ANSWER
Conclusion Does Not Follow
EXPLANATION
Let’s define:
A = international law firms
B = exempt from anti-money laundering regulations
C = have offices in over 30 countries
We’re told: 1️⃣ No A → B (no international law firm is exempt) 2️⃣ Some A → C (some international law firms have many offices)
The conclusion says (A + C + B) at least one, meaning: at least one big international law firm is exempt.
But statement 1️⃣ makes it clear that no international law firm is exempt, regardless of size or location. Therefore, this conclusion directly contradicts the facts and does not follow.
Question 6
Under the revised academic funding policy, a university department may either receive government research grants or accept corporate sponsorship, but not both. All departments in the School of Pure Sciences receive government research grants. No department that accepts corporate sponsorship is allowed to participate in national ethics committees.
Proposed Conclusion:
Departments that participate in national ethics committees may be receiving government research grants.
YOUR ANSWER
Not answered(INCORRECT)
CORRECT ANSWER
Conclusion Follows
EXPLANATION
Departments that accept corporate sponsorship are not allowed to participate in national ethics committees. So, departments on the committees must be from the group that does not accept sponsorship. Since departments can either get grants or sponsorship, these committee members may indeed be those who receive government research grants. ➡️ The conclusion is consistent with the premises and therefore follows.
Question 7
The summer swimming program will include 12 beginner classes and 8 advanced classes at the community pool. All classes will be taught by certified instructors.
Proposed Interpretation:
The program includes classes for swimmers who are not beginners.
YOUR ANSWER
Not answered(INCORRECT)
CORRECT ANSWER
Conclusion Follow
EXPLANATION
Correct Answer: Conclusion Follows. The statement says the program will include 8 advanced classes, which means it has classes for swimmers who are not beginners.
Question 8
The travel agency offers guided city tours that include transportation and a professional guide. Bookings can be made online or at the agency’s main office.
Proposed Interpretation:
Bookings made online include a complimentary travel insurance policy.
YOUR ANSWER
Not answered(INCORRECT)
CORRECT ANSWER
Conclusion Does Not Follow
EXPLANATION
Correct Answer: Conclusion Does Not Follow. The statement says bookings can be made online or at the office, but it does not mention anything about travel insurance being included with online bookings.
Question 9
A neighborhood community center introduced app-based class reservations, converted a lounge into a quiet study room, and opened a supervised playroom so parents can work out nearby. Staff said the aim is to reduce last-minute class cancellations and make visits easier for families.
Proposed Inference:
The supervised playroom is operated by licensed childcare professionals.
YOUR ANSWER
Not answered(INCORRECT)
CORRECT ANSWER
Insufficient Data
EXPLANATION
The passage says the playroom is supervised, but gives no details about qualifications or licensing. It could be staffed by certified childcare workers, regular center employees, or vetted volunteers. With no staffing info provided, there’s no basis to judge the claim true or false.
Question 10
In September 2025, a neighborhood café introduced a weekday breakfast combo at $6.50 (coffee + pastry), advertised as $2.00 cheaper than buying the items separately. Loyalty members earn 3 bonus points per combo (every 10 points = $1 credit). Individual item prices remained unchanged, and the café added a 10-combo punch card that gives the 11th combo free.
Proposed Inference:
The popularity of the breakfast combo will be determined solely by the 3 bonus points perk.
YOUR ANSWER
Not answered(INCORRECT)
CORRECT ANSWER
Probably False
EXPLANATION
Multiple incentives are in play: an immediate $2 price advantage, a punch card freebie, and bonus points. It’s unlikely that popularity would hinge only on the points when the price discount and punch card also attract buyers. The text doesn’t say it’s impossible, so Probably False” (not False”) is the best fit.
Your Linklaters Application: From Online Form to Job Offer
Think like counsel drafting a memo:
Start with the results you want to achieve by stating the specific percentage increase of X before explaining the methods used to achieve it.
Use examples that reflect the company values of teamwork and innovation and client impact.
The story requires a single situation and one obstacle and one decisive action and one measurable result for narrative tightness.
Pro move: Use the same signals across assets—your application’s “evidence mindset” should echo your Watson Glaser method and your interview rationale.
Watson Glaser for Linklaters – The Skills They’re Really Testing
Signal Discrimination – separating material facts from noise under time pressure.
Scope Control – refusing to overgeneralise from a single example.
Cognitive Resilience – resetting after a hard item without emotional carry-over.
The system gives priority to information that affects clients in their business operations.
Micro-drill: Read a 150-word business paragraph and extract (a) premise list, (b) a single cautious conclusion, (c) what you cannot conclude. Do this daily.
What Score Will Secure Your Spot? Understanding Pass Marks
Linklaters doesn’t publish pass marks.Top-quartile performance which translates to top 20–25% performance in practice remains competitive. Two truths:
A high score doesn’t guarantee progression; a low score almost always blocks it.
Recruiters prefer to see consistent performance instead of occasional high scores so focus on getting multiple consecutive strong mock results rather than a single exceptional score.
The accuracy tracking needs to be done by section during the time period. Start by moving drills to the Inference section after your timed score falls below 70%.
Life After the Test – Linklaters Graduate Recruitment Pathways
Pass the test and you’re in contention for:
Vacation Scheme – show your method in real matters.
Training Contract – structured growth with high exposure.
Direct Graduate Entry – for profiles with proven edge.
Keep your signals consistent: evidence-led stories, disciplined reasoning, and commercial empathy.The consistency factor establishes a comfortable setting which enables partners to accept each other's agreements.
Final Word
Most applicants “practise questions”.The ones who progress engineer their cognition.Create your trap library while training your pacing and logging errors like a scientist to make your thinking clear. The Linklaters Watson Glaser becomes a green light when you follow this approach.
FAQs: Linklaters Watson Glaser Test
What is the Watson Glaser Test and why does Linklaters use it?
The Watson Glaser assessment evaluates critical thinking skills through its evaluation of your ability to analyze information and draw logical conclusions and evaluate evidence. Linklaters employs this method to find candidates who demonstrate their ability to solve intricate legal problems while working against deadlines.
How is the Linklaters Watson Glaser Test different from the standard version?
While the core format remains the same, Linklaters often sets a higher benchmark score and may include questions that mirror real legal reasoning challenges.
What is the pass score for Linklaters’ Watson Glaser Test?
The Linklaters official pass mark remains unknown but candidates who perform well usually score between 20% and 25% of the total marks.
Can I retake the Linklaters Watson Glaser Test if I fail?
Generally, you cannot retake within the same recruitment cycle, so preparation before your first attempt is essential.
How should I prepare for the Linklaters Watson Glaser Test?
The training program should include timed practice tests together with question-type familiarity and targeted reasoning skills training. Reviewing real practice questions under time pressure is key.
Is the test the same for all roles at Linklaters?
No – it’s most commonly used for graduate, vacation scheme, and trainee solicitor applications, though some lateral hires may also take it.
Does Linklaters give feedback on Watson Glaser results?
The feedback system usually only indicates if you have moved on to the next stage but it does not provide detailed scores.
What happens after I pass the Watson Glaser Test at Linklaters?
Successful candidates usually progress to interviews, case studies, or assessment centre exercises as part of the recruitment process.
Does Linklaters Compare to Other Magic Circle Firms in Testing?
While all Magic Circle firms are hunting for razor-sharp critical thinkers, Linklaters takes the Watson Glaser test to another level.The benchmark scores of their work tend to be higher and the scenarios often have a sharper commercial edge – reflecting the fast-paced, high-stakes environment you’ll be stepping into. The practice version at Linklaters for firms such as Clifford Chance, Freshfields, or Allen & Overy will feel more intense. The test aims to assess your capacity to stay focused under actual stressful conditions instead of attempting to deceive you. To achieve success one must learn the particular method of each person.
Mindset Hacks to Ace the Linklaters Watson Glaser Assessment
Your mindset on test day can make or break your performance.The candidates who succeed in the exam do not necessarily have the highest intelligence but they possess the ability to remain calm and focused while relying on their preparation.
Three mental switches can instantly boost your score:
Reframe the pressure – View the test as a challenge you are prepared for, not a threat.
The process should take precedence over perfection because following a clear step-by-step method produces better results than trying to achieve immediate “feel right” answers.
Visualise success – Picture yourself opening that “You’ve progressed to the next stage” email before you even start the test.
These aren’t just tips – they’re proven mental triggers that help your brain perform at its best under pressure.
Real Candidate Experiences with the Linklaters Assessment
Many previous candidates reported that the Watson Glaser test proved more challenging than anticipated because the time seemed to pass at an accelerated pace rather than because the questions were difficult to understand. The test-takers who succeeded at the exam described their ability to identify question patterns rapidly and their skill in controlling time to the exact second and their ability to remain composed when they were unsure of an answer.
Some mention that the Linklaters recruitment team moves fast – if you pass, you’ll often hear back quickly.The majority of students agree that consistent practice before the test day was the most important factor for their success. Others stress that consistent practice before the test day made the biggest difference.
Reading these experiences isn’t just interesting – it’s a reminder that preparation, strategy, and mindset are what separate those who make it to the interview stage from those who don’t.
Related articles to Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test
Join our growing community of successful candidates who aced their tests with TestRocket's AI-powered preparation. Start practicing today with our 30-day money-back guarantee.
30-Day Money-Back Guarantee
AI Powered Prep
★4.9/5 Average Rating
Testrocket.ai provides a range of practice aptitude tests to help candidates prepare for
third-party assessments. Testrocket.ai is an independent provider and has no sponsorship,
endorsement, or affiliation with Watson-Glaser, or any other test publisher. All test
names, logos, and related trademarks are the property of their respective owners.